Actually, the rant itself is more a rant on stupidity than politics, though it's based in politics.  A bit ago, people were linking to this video clip (page link, and direct link to video swf):

Page
Direct Link

And then laughing about how it was great/funny/whatever.  I watched it and thought... this video is stupid... really stupid.  I can only assume it was funny to other people because they're Anti-Bush Democrats and see it as a "gotcha!"  The thing is, it's not at all...

Some brackground, I consider myself pretty centrist, most political quizzes say I'm a Libertarian.  I really don't care either way.  Personally, I think term limits are a good thing, and that the back and forth play between the two major parties is what keeps things sane, instead of one being right and the other wrong.

So anyway, the video... it basically consists of Rumsfeld saying how neither he nor the President said anything about Saddam/Iraq being an immediate threat.  Right off the bat they question him about "nobody in the Administration said that?"... he didn't say nobody, he said neither he nor the President, and he claries by saying he can't speak for the entire Administration, and then asks them for citations saying otherwise if they have them.

So first, they pull a quote from Rumsfeld himself saying:

"Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent, that Saddam is at least five to seven years away from having nuclear weapons.  I would not be so certain."

So I thought, since when does "not be so certain" mean "Yes, definitely."?  It doesn't... he said he wouldn't be so certain that it was that far off, he didn't say it was an immediate threat, he said he wasn't certain.  Gotcha?  I guess if you completely warp the meaning of "not be so certain" to something completely different, then sure...

So they go right on to the next quote from Rumsfeld, which says:

"No terror state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq."

They even went so far as to put "immediate threat" in red text so it stands out.  Gotcha again?  If you completely ignore the context of the phrase and what he was saying.  That qualifier "more" in particular stands out, as it was ignored completely... guess what, nothing poses a more immediate threat to the shrinking of my family than my parents' deaths, but does that mean my parents' deaths are an immediate threat???  That it's imminent that they will die just because that's the foremost threat to the shrinking of my family?  No... it means that's the foremost event... foremost does not mean immediate or imminent.  Even simpler, nothing poses a more immediate threat to my life ending as my death... so my death is an immediate threat?  No...

And at that point, they immediately fade out as Rumsfeld starts explaining, and they put up in ominous red text, "It's time for the deception to stop."  What the hell???  A completely deceptive partial video that completely takes two quotes out of context, and changes and warps the meaning of words in them, is calling for the deception to stop???

So yes, this is my rant on stupidity.  If someone sees something wrong with what I've said, please point it out.  The whole thing made me boggles.  And it scares me how easily the people who linked me to this were taken in by it.  I voiced my argument to them as I have here, and no one responded or even acknowledged it.  I'm not sure if that was because I'm accurately pointing out huge flaws in the video, and they had no recourse, or simply because they lost interest and decided not to pay attention.

Comment away!


Eh. I see your point. But I also think that a lot of people in this country are sheep, and so ads are geared towards herding sheep. Give them an argument that -without thinking about it - sounds logical and outlines a definite "good" side vs. "bad" side. The sheep will go wherever they're herded. The people that actually think about things like this are few and far between, sadly - and the LJ community probably has a larger ratio of thinkers to non-thinkers, so you'll find more who agree with you around here than you would in a random sample of the American population. The sheep are probably too busy discussing the latest episode of American Idol or Survivor or whatever scandal is hot on TV this week (is it Martha, or is her moment of infamy already over?)

Mutton, anyone?


sorry, but i posted something in the sxe community that was supposed to go in the seinfeld community. can you please delete it so it doesnt cause confusion? thanks<3


Hi, I hate to bother you in your personal journal, but it's kind of important(to me anyway). My hotmail e-mail account was recently broken into, and in it there are various other passwords that whoever hacked into my account now has. I'm in your sxe community, and I have a feeling it's one of the anonymous commenters from there. They changed the password hint to "drink rules" so, I would definitely assume so. I'm not friends with, nor do I personally know anyone who'd do this. I was wondering, since it says IPs are logged in the sxe community, you could supply me with the anonymous commenter's IP(s) from the post: http://www.livejournal.com/community/sxe/847463.html . This would help me out so much if they are the ones who got into my account(and again, like I said, i'm quite sure it's one of them.. since I have no idea who else it could be.

Thanks,

Katy





Bill 
Morgan 
Jason 
Melanie 
Josh 
Theo 
Justin 
00101101 
Chris 
Lynn 
Bryon